From Reuters BRUSSELS, July 6 (Reuters) - The European Parliament on Wednesday backed EU rules labelling investments in gas and nuclear power plants as climate-friendly, throwing out an attempt to block the law that has exposed deep rifts between countries over how to fight climate change. That just about gives you the short version. Some points to clear up: this (apparently) isn't a rash movement that is occurring only because of the current energy crisis. The question of whether nuclear energy and gas could be classified as 'green' aka sustainable under the EU taxonomy was put forward back in 2020, with the rules now in the news being put forward back in early February of this year, prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Secondly, the article doesn't claim that the EU plans to declare that nuclear energy or gas are 'green,' rather that investment into nuclear and gas would count as investment in green energy, which doubtless carries all sorts of financial...
After the winners of the ACX Book Review Contest were announced, I took a closer look at the gold medalist, Lars Doucet's review of Henry George's Progress and Poverty . Reading it, I was surprised to find the outline of a birds-eye political philosophy which didn't make me want to tear my hair out. I brought this up with family, and immediately got stuck on whether or not Bitcoin counted as Wealth in the Georgist framework, as expected. So before I read the text itself, I wanted to jot down some early thoughts. Much of this post is taken directly from Doucet's review. First, I'll need to examine George's definition of Wealth, why money doesn't fit the bill, and what it means for money to be a claim on wealth, and whether digital currencies are closer to dollars or gold bars. This has less to do with Georgism and more with settling a personal argument. Second, before Georgism, the high-level political philosophy which made the most sense to me was David F...
[Edit: The Book Review Contest has ended, and I particularly recommend you read the gold medalist, Lars Doucet’s review of Progress and Poverty, which I take a look at here ] This was the book review I submitted for Scott Alexander's book review contest. Sadly, it was not a finalist, and now that the runners-up have been released, I reproduce it here. If you enjoy the review, do give it the rating you think it deserves on the Runner-Up Votes , and check out some of the other non-finalists ( Runners-Up A-R , Runners-Up S-W ). Also worth noting, I submitted my own review before Scott published his , and I preregistered this book for review last year when the contest was announced. I. Prologue Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder , by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, seems to have anticipated my project of reviewing it, and took pains to make it difficult for me. Writing on the book’s structure: Someone in the business of “summarizing” books would have to write four or five separate des...
Comments
Post a Comment