From Reuters BRUSSELS, July 6 (Reuters) - The European Parliament on Wednesday backed EU rules labelling investments in gas and nuclear power plants as climate-friendly, throwing out an attempt to block the law that has exposed deep rifts between countries over how to fight climate change. That just about gives you the short version. Some points to clear up: this (apparently) isn't a rash movement that is occurring only because of the current energy crisis. The question of whether nuclear energy and gas could be classified as 'green' aka sustainable under the EU taxonomy was put forward back in 2020, with the rules now in the news being put forward back in early February of this year, prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Secondly, the article doesn't claim that the EU plans to declare that nuclear energy or gas are 'green,' rather that investment into nuclear and gas would count as investment in green energy, which doubtless carries all sorts of financial...
[Following an analysis of Oedipus Tyrannos ] Be given the crown, be given the throne, be given the queen-- not a crown, a throne, a queen-- the exact same throne, the exact same queen , this is the limit of his imagination, the imagination of a 5 year old, an imagination which was never forced=allowed to want something different. Always: who am I ? And never: what do I do ? “I want to be King.” You want to rule? “Easy does it, let's not get ahead of ourselves.” It can't be birthright because birthright isn't you; and anyway it means you are no longer an individual but have inherited all of the responsibility of action. “I’m not so shallow to want to be the main character in my own story, what I'm really looking for is to be the main character in a play written and directed by someone else.” Well, I got this short one, there's not much action in it, it's more of a character piece. “That sounds perfect.” It ends tragi...
After the winners of the ACX Book Review Contest were announced, I took a closer look at the gold medalist, Lars Doucet's review of Henry George's Progress and Poverty . Reading it, I was surprised to find the outline of a birds-eye political philosophy which didn't make me want to tear my hair out. I brought this up with family, and immediately got stuck on whether or not Bitcoin counted as Wealth in the Georgist framework, as expected. So before I read the text itself, I wanted to jot down some early thoughts. Much of this post is taken directly from Doucet's review. First, I'll need to examine George's definition of Wealth, why money doesn't fit the bill, and what it means for money to be a claim on wealth, and whether digital currencies are closer to dollars or gold bars. This has less to do with Georgism and more with settling a personal argument. Second, before Georgism, the high-level political philosophy which made the most sense to me was David F...
Comments
Post a Comment